Archive for April 2008

Our Last Class But It’s The First Campaign!

April 17, 2008

We’re down to one last class—hard to believe, huh? For class, read the assigned chapters of my book and dig around on,, Obama’s tech plan, a Washington Post op-ed I did last fall, and Patrick Ruffini’s thoughts on the subject.

I also wanted to take a minute to explain what I’m looking for in your critiques: Basically, the critique of your classmate’s paper is a second chance for you to prove your knowledge of Web 2.0. Put yourself in the shoes of the person receiving this possible project plan for approval. Would you accept it? Has your classmate proved his or her case for a Web 2.0 undertaking?

How thoroughly did your classmate think through the various avenues open to his or her project? Were the most appropriate technologies incorporated into it? Do you have suggestions for other websites, ideas, or technologies that you would use?

How thoroughly did your classmate consider the competitive field? Are there obvious problems with the plan?

As I said last night, while there’s no set page length, I’d be surprised if you were able to accomplish this all in under a page or a page and a half.

On Wednesday please bring a paper hard copy of the final project you critiqued with your critique attached to it. Your critiques are for my eyes only. The subject of your critique will not see your critique unless you wish to give him or her a copy.

Make sure to also read the entry below on What You Owe Me.

What You Owe Me

April 17, 2008

There’s been some confusion over what’s due for the blogs, so I wanted to take this chance to clear that all up. Next Wednesday, when class begins, you owe me 19 entries—13 “response” blogs and six additional blog entries of your choosing. Three of these six additional entries must reference and be in response to a classmate’s blog or a thread you find on another blog (i.e. they must build upon a conversation taking place elsewhere on the web.). Three entries may be on any subject you choose under the sun.

Thus, all told, you must have an entry that matches each of the following criteria:

1) Response Blog: Intro/We the Media
2) Response Blog: Naked Conversations
3) Response Blog: Long Tail
4) Response Blog: Google
5) Response Blog: Social Media I
6) Response Blog: Social Media II
7) Response Blog: Topic of your choosing (Spring Break week)
8) Response Blog: Wikipedia/Loose Change
9) Response Blog: Gaming
10) Response Blog: Global Voices
11) Response Blog: Iraq
12) Response Blog: Politics Online/Dean Campaign
13) Response Blog: The First Campaign
14) Other blog response #1
15) Other blog response #2
16) Other blog response #3
17) Misc. entry #1
18) Misc. entry #2
19) Misc. entry #3

To be clear: No late blog entries will be accepted. Your blog as of 7:30 p.m. next Wednesday will be what you are graded on. This is a major part of your grade and so please please do it. Skipping an entry here or there makes the points add up pretty quickly.

In addition to the blog, you need to have posted at least 20 links on, turned in a social media report, and on Wednesday you’re expected to turn in both a copy of your project critique as well as a copy of the project you critiqued (i.e. the printout you got from a delightful classmate last night).

If you have any questions on what you owe, email me as soon as possible. Unless I speak with you before Wednesday’s class, I will not accept late assignments or projects.

Also, if you missed class on a night when a quiz took place, your grade will not reflect that quiz (i.e. your grade will be based on a maximum of 95 points instead of 100), making all of your other assignments that much more important.

Politics I

April 10, 2008

I hope you’re hard at work on your final projects, which are due on Wednesday.

You will need to bring a printed copy of your half of the final project to class on Wednesday night. If, for whatever reason, your project will be late, you MUST email me by 3 p.m. on Wednesday afternoon so that we can figure out when you will be finished, make alternative arraignments, and be able to hand it off to your designated classmate for a critique. Any excused late paper will be penalized three points.

Because your classmates are counting on you finishing on time in order for them to be able to do their critique and the second half of the project, unexcused late projects (i.e. if you don’t email me before class) will not be accepted.

On to class: This week we’re going to look at the Dean campaign in 2003 and 2004 and talk about its impact on online campaigning. Here are some articles to get you started:

Also check out this nifty archive of the Dean bats. If you really get into this, there’s a new Dean internet book out too.

Also: As I said, I want to offer a second “Omniclass” opportunity on Wednesday, so if there are topics you’d like me to cover, please let me know! This is your last chance to ask all of the random internet-related questions you have kicking around in your head.

War on the Web

April 4, 2008

Good morning! I promised you a good James Fallows article on China’s Great Firewall, so here it is, as well as an interview on the same subject. If you want to page through some of the sites we covered, check out the class feed.

Our subject this week is going to be the war in Iraq and the unique stories that have come out of it—the first war fought since Web 2.0.

Feeling the traditional media wasn’t covering Iraq went and using VOIP technology, Swarthmore college students started putting together a regular news show interviewing Iraqis. Here’s an NPR story on it and then go listen to some of the podcasts.

The newest aspects of Web 2.0 in the war is how it allows us on the home front to hear from soldiers and civilians in the war zone in real time. Salem Pax was one of the first Iraqi bloggers in Baghdad, and the Baghdad Burning blog actually ended up being turned into a book. Its author, Riverbend, is still unknown.

Here’s a roundup of the best military blogs (or milblogs) right now and a site that rounds up milblogging. Army of Dude is one of the biggest. The military isn’t sure exactly how to deal with the bloggers (but then again, it seems to be like John Kerry: Both for and against the same things). Colby Buzzell‘s blog ended up launching a successful book (it won the Lulu Blooker Prize, for best blog to become a book) and he’s continuing to write for GQ. I recommend picking up the book if you want a good soldier’s memoir.

One of the biggest controversies to break out online is over Kevin Sites, who was an independent journalist in Iraq and videotaped what appeared to be a soldier shooting an unarmed wounded Iraqi. He now has a book/documentary out about his career. You can also see his Flickr feed. Here’s an interview that discusses his offbeat path.

Of course Sites isn’t the only one in Iraq with a video camera—the troops have them too and seem to spend a lot of time mixing patriotic videos (WARNING: some of this is graphic war footage). Dig around on YouTube and see what good videos you find. Controversial videos have also surfaced of private contractors shooting at civilian cars. This week, at least one YouTube video of the war.

The web is also being used to rally veterans to oppose the war. But is that a good thing?

This week, dig around, read a few blogs, and write about what surprises you. Is seeing and reading about war a good thing or a bad thing? Should we have this much access to the front lines?